Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distil Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Distil Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Coverage is mostly attempts at self-promotion such as: "Beware the botnet lurking unseen on your computer | Irish Examiner-Jul 22, 2018 | Some 8% of all bad bot traffic comes from mobile devices, according to a report from Distil Networks, a specialist in bot mitigation, website ..." etc. Created by Special:Contributions/Gogo_Rulez with few other contributions outside this topic and whose account is currently globally blocked. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, no significant intellectually independent coverage. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Though recreation in near future is possible and wouldn't be controversial. शिव साहिल (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.