Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divaa Victoria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Divaa Victoria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this person meets the notability guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-unsourced BLP, with no notability to be found.Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 20:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG —Мандичка^YO 😜 23:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely nothing to suggest this is notable aside from self-generated content. SwisterTwister talk 23:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of meeting WP:GNG whatsoever. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as subject's claims to titles appear to be for years in which those competitions were not held. Article is not a blatant hoax but it's largely unverifiable, thus failing to cross the first and most important threshold for inclusion. - Dravecky (talk) 08:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, could not find references to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.