Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divided We Fall (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Divided We Fall (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NVG with only primary sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 19:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging our resident Dutch-speaking editors, in case they can find more in Dutch sources: @Soetermans and Maplestrip czar 21:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• XGN and Eurogamer are good signs. Both Thegg.net and MMOHuts look very unprofessional, but I otherwise don't know anything about them. Same with MMOGames, though at least that website lists the experience of the staff. I don't like using these websites... I'll ask my brother-in-law whether this game was mentioned in the Dutch Gameplay magazine, and I may look through some magazines for articles on this game when I pass by a kiosk. No strong opinions yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if the game is notable. ~Mable (chat) 10:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found a short, one-paragraph piece on Divided We Fall in the October issue of the Dutch Gameplay magazine. Not a full article, mind you, but it does announce that the game came out of early access, describes the background of the game, and describes the gameplay in short. I don't really have access to other gaming magazines from that month. I tried the website of Power Unlimited, but there's nothing on there on this game. To move on to a purely online source: Gamer.nl has never mentioned the game according to their search function. Seeing the low amount of coverage by even Dutch gaming sources, I'd deem this video game not notable. We've searched for sources and found only three that are definitely worth something. It's pretty much on the edge of notability, though. ~Mable (chat) 18:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. In light of no major reviews from a game released in 2016, the news announcements don't cut it. I'd be fine with moving this to draftspace for the author to continue work, but the primary sources need to be axed and much more secondary source material needs to be added. (Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?)) czar 16:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.