Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dix Dev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dix Dev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed as part of a driveby PROD removal and I still confirm my PROD here, searches found nothing and there's nothing for applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as absolutely not notable. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Could not find any reliable coverage. ~Kvng (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A google search turned up zero sources pertaining to the topic. --Dps04 (talk) 17:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.