Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doc Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doc Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know if this person meets notability standards, and I have serious doubts. Most of the sources in the article are listicles, all of them are industry publications. A search for additional sources turned up nothing reliable or independent. Ego White Tray (talk) 19:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This person is also known as Nasty Habits. An Allmusic bio, Rough Guide entry, and apparent (from the snippet) The Wire album review is enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. Gong show 03:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Gongshow's sources show that WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO are met. Additionally, we should probably add a hatnote to Nasty Habits pointing to Doc Scott, since he is also known by that name in d&b circles. — sparklism ^hey! 08:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant coverage identified above satisfies both WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. --Michig (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.