Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Documentum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Documentum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire article is written like one big advertisement. Taking a look at it, it's very obvious to see that it is either written by AI, or it is solely written as a marketing tool. The main product of the article is also non-notable. st4rry :3 (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article strangely survived a deletion attempt in 2008, although the article was pretty much an advertisement then, and still is today. This article may have survived deletion once, but shouldnt a second. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Agree with nom - clearly written for advertisement/promo - section are written like a marketing presentation - e.g "Future Vision" with source as a whitepaper linked to a non-working link! Asteramellus (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree the existing article is functionally an advertisement, and the subject isn't notable. Omnigrade (talk) 18:01, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.