Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doja Cat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doja Cat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed here, one day because its scheduled deletion but I still confirm it, article for a new and starting person and none of this actually establishes what we need for independent notability and substance, the one link is still not being the substance we need for an article, and it merely emphasizes how "starting" her career actually is. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:46, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete as a WP:TOOSOON - I see a mention on the most minor imaginable Billboard chart, and not one that swings it for me. Willing to be convinced though - David Gerard (talk) 10:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass our notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-per nom, I'm also finding tons of articles by this creator that I've been putting BLP prods/prods on that just don't seem notable. Wgolf (talk) 22:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.