Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dojeon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Jeung San Do. Should reliable, secondary, independent sources become available, these redirects can be restored and returned to article status. The main consideration right now is the lack of independent sources. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dojeon

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Sangsaeng

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the Dojeon deserves its own article separate from the main article on Jeung San Do because I couldn't find any reliable sources that focus specifically on the Dojeon. The entire article appears to be sourced from https://en.dojeon.org

Additionally, I am also nominating the following articles for deletion because they are all Jeung San Do ideas that are not covered by sources independent from the Jeung San Do movement:

Wpstatus (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Wpstatus (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. I agree that it belongs in the main article as there is too much good info here to throw out. However, a merge without inline cites is bad form. I added a plea to the Talk and pinged editors of this article or the primary to see if anything can be salvaged. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 18:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jeung San Do. The entire article is unreferenced and seems based on primary material so it should not be merged unless other reliable sources can be found. - Indefensible (talk) 23:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as I think a bundled nomination like this needs more input from editors. My question, is it being suggested to Merge all of these articles to a target article? Because that would be a huge addition to a target article. And is that target article Jeung San Do as was offered in the suggestion to Redirect or was a different target article envisioned here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed the other articles listed, they should all just be redirected to Jeung San Do in my opinion unless more sources can be found as they are basically unreferenced. - Indefensible (talk) 22:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.