Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Door chain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No valid rationale for deletion. Geschichte (talk) 17:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Door chain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary; only cites 2 sources, neither of which are reliable, and does not seem too notable. Philosophy2 (talk) 04:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because this is a very common type of lock. The article can be improved, and I'm certain there are a ton of sources about it. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 04:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added two references (and now a third). Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per existence of multiple academic sources via a Google Books search. feminist (+) 16:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. feminist (+) 16:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very commonplace, a huge percentage of apartments or houses throughout the entire world have something like this. Needs better references but WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP. Needs tidying not deleting. Canterbury Tail talk 16:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.