Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Commander (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) → Call me Razr Nation 01:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Double Commander

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Marslo2015 (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not 100% sure about this, but it does seem notable: [1] from Softpedia, [2] from de:PC Magazin, [3] from de:Computer Bild, [4] from Chip. I generally don't like leaning so heavily on download sites, but their reviews seem to be reliable. Note: the last three of the links are in German, and my German is atrocious, so I had to use Google Translate. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the German references and found the last two to be reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not personally familiar with this product, but Google turns up enough mentionings (and some in-deep discussions) to make this topic notable. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.