Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Jaraczewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 21:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Jaraczewski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find various refs to support this article, but nothing that looks very substantial. Incidentally he has 16 (sic) twitter followers. Not really sure if he’s notable so bringing it here to seek a consensus. Mccapra (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing really indicates notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist as political party fundraisers, but this is not referenced anywhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG for it: most of the references are primary sources or blogs that do not count as support for notability at all, and he's the bylined author, not the subject, of the only one that actually comes from a real daily newspaper. Bearcat (talk) 18:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bearcat (no relation) - his only fame is inherited from others' campaigns. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC) P.S. There is a similarly-named Planned Parenthood official who is no more notable, but some Internet searches might conflate the two men. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As noted by others, the sourcing in the article is woefully inadequate to meet notability, nor can I find any coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:NPERSON. Yet another political operative who, despite the effort to the contrary, has no place in Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.