Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Rowell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Rowell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED. Despite a very long list of references, none of them appear to discuss the subject in any depth. The article is basically just a resume and neither WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO seem to be met. Note that some of the more RS referenced do not even mention the subject: e.g. [1] [2]. SmartSE (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable ad exec.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.