Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Download Youtube Video Using 3 Different Methods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:LINKSPAM by article Shirt58 (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Download Youtube Video Using 3 Different Methods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty much per the contested proposed deletion: Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. No reliable independent sources.

See the related article Download youtube videos and AfD for article. Editor appears to be a single-purpose account here to advertise a particular piece of software. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unencyclopaedic instruction manual on downloading. WP is not Answers.com. (BTW, I just restored the AfD tag on the article itself. -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 06:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article author has a habit of removing AfD and TfD notices. I warned the editor again about removal of deletion templates. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with above justification and would suggest this is in fact a strong candidate for CSD. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.