Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drawshooting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drawshooting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable under WP:GNG. No significant coverage in independent sources. Acalycine (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's taking photographs, for heaven's sake. Everything else is just soapbox. We could also redirect to Street photography but I'm not convinced the term merits one. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Looks to be an attempt to legitimize a particular term/technique. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. The term has not found acceptance among specialists, and is not widely used. Mduvekot (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.