Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DropMind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DropMind

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. - Mr X 13:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Good Article: Contains all the info I need and is definitely Wiki style. From what I can see all the obstacles that users have reported and would go in favor of deleting have been removed. The software is definitely notable and the tons of references below show the benefits it might bring. --Jordevstefan (talk) 07:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No 3rd party sources to prove notability under wp:nsoftware.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Software seems interesting enough but without sufficient sources it can't claim notability or be expanded.--Tco03displays (talk) 13:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 13:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The product and its company merely seem to exist. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:16, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article I use this application and it is great! The article is informative and the company is highly known here in Sweden User:VictorySweden — VictorySweden (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Nice article The article is proper, I have worked with this international company and am using this product for my every day work. User:erememel —Preceding undated comment added 15:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC) — erememel (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete It might be good software. No one is disputing that. The question is whether it's notable. For those canvassed, the criteria for software to be notable are any of:

The software is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field. References that cite trivia do not fulfill this requirement. See following section for more information.
The software is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs. This criterion does not apply to software merely used in instruction.
The software is the subject of multiple printed third party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews, written by independent authors and published by independent publishers.
It is published software that has been recognized as having historical or technical significance by reliable sources. However, the mere existence of reviews does not mean the software is notable. Reviews must be significant, from a reliable source, and/or assert notability.

If you can show that Dropmind fits any of those categories, I'd be delighted to see the evidence and will change to a keep. But from what I've seen it doesn't - Google gave me nothing useful just now. But I can't, unfortunately read the Swedish press at all and don't know what e.g. notable newspapers in Sweden would be. Neonchameleon (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article Dropmind notable because:

Is actively taking part in biggest mind mapping community Biggerplate http://www.biggerplate.com/mindmapping-software/dropmind where people share different maps for education, learning and business.
There is a free desktop version of dropmind that is widely used by students and universities http://www.dropmind.com/free-mindmapping-software; http://www.teachersfirst.com/single.cfm?id=10178;.
there is a free Ipad/iphone lite version of drop mind that is used by student from many universities round the globe https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dropmind-lite-mind-mapping/id483116055?mt=8;
few independent references where software is reviewed through the years: http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/dropmind/ ; http://www.mind-mapping.org/blog/2013/08/dropmind-revisited/ ; http://www.hypershifters.com/blog/2011-09-05/dropmind-web-review-–-part-2.html ; http://www.appvita.com/2009/05/22/dropmind-mapping-your-thoughts-in-a-more-structured-way/ ; http://www.cloudtools.nl/saas-samenwerken/review-dropmind-web-online-mindmappen-gekoppeld-aan-andere-software/ ; http://sujay-ghosh.blogspot.com/2010/10/dropmind-product-review-picture-your.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gancev (talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC) — Gancev (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Informative article for widely used product The product exists several years on the market and is available on different platforms. Here are some references that I found about DropMind. Defiantly notable product, here are the sources:
The product is available on the largest mind mapping community in the world – Biggerpalte, where people download FREE useful mind maps/template:

http://biggerplateblog.blogspot.com/2013/08/dropmind-arrives-on-biggerplate.html; http://www.mindmaphub.com/dropmind-joins-biggerplate-mind-map-library/.

Self-determining mind mapping software comparison reviews: http://www.dlssolutions.com/blog/2013/11/mind-mapping-tools-for-software-development.htmlhttp://www.dlssolutions.com/blog/;

http://www.educationtech-nation.com/#!organization-tools/c2417; http://www.indoition.com/de/kreativitaet-produktivitaet-tools-technische-dokumentation.htm; http://bloggingexperiment.com/time-management-tactics-and-resources.

Self-governing reviews for DropMind on different blogs:

http://mind-map.akamonitor.cz/2011/07/dropmind-mm-software-slideshow-review.html; http://www.mind-mapping.org/blog/2013/08/dropmind-revisited/ ; http://www.freemindparlexemple.fr/2011/08/dropmind-version-3-un-challenger-de.html; http://assistivetek.blogspot.com/2009/12/seavus-dropmind-11-is-released.html; http://digitalmindmap.blogspot.com/2011/12/dropmind-takes-your-research-to-another.html; https://paulhami.edublogs.org/tag/dropmind/; http://www.visual-mapping.com/2009/02/dropmind-brand-new-mind-mapping.html; http://wwwhatsnew.com/2011/04/07/dropmind-siente-piensa-y-disena-tu-mapa-mental/; http://mindmapblog.com/?p=4690.

DropMind on iPad :

http://dailyappshow.com/create-a-visual-map-of-your-next-brilliant-idea-with-dropmind-for-ipad; http://torres21.typepad.com/apps/2013/04/dropmind-lite.html. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zokii tr (talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC) — Zokii tr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete. Most of the article is about the Seavus company, which is covered by it's own article. No need to have a seperate article for this product, just to squeeze in two descriptive sentences. Maybe a section about the software could be added to the Seavus (company) article? Josh3580_talk/hist 17:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems legit: This article has good information. It is written in an unbiased manner. --Magjov (talk) 08:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)— Magjov (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Redirect- to Seavus company. No notability apart from parent company. Refs in article do not constitute significant coverage in reliable sources, and are instead blogs, incidental mentions, or company pages. A search did not reveal significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 07:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.