Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DrugDev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DrugDev

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references here don't appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH; article content is mundane corporate press and not about what the company did. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 03:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 03:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 03:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 03:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - sources in article are all poor as per nom. A BEFORE check elsewhere does come up with a few reliable/independent sources but while not strictly on things prohibited by CorpDepth, they don't actually discuss the company's actions, making them fairly unhelpful for purposes. There is so much coverage (much of it from their hyperactive PR department) that I wouldn't be shocked if there were at least a couple of beneficial sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is far from WP:NCORP, a preliminary search only brought up PR releases, niche outlets and passing mentions. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 16:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet current standards. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.