Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke's Smoked Meats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duke's Smoked Meats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Bfpage |leave a message 16:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me, I may not be following the instructions correctly but I have nominated this article for deletion because it is not notable and it reads like an advertisement.

User:MSGfood 17:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response: I made the edit about MSG, adding the word 'harmful' into it so it is clear this is not and ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.138.204.62 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 26 September 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 17:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Whether or not it's advertising, this company doesn't appear notable per WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Media coverage cited in the article is local. The only non-local RS coverage I could find was a writeup in a trade magazine. Lots of self-published hits found. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.