Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dullar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. as an article on the village Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dullar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that this is a notable group. Boleyn (talk) 09:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – In case the Dullar clan fails notability, Dullar should be kept as a village article, as there's a namesake village in the clan's region – for details, please see this revision of Dullar. If the clan fails notability, there won't be any topic left on wiki, which is titled as Dullar. In short, the revision cited by me will be a valid article, as per WP:NPLACE.

PS: WP:DISCUSSAFD states that WP:ATD should be considered, which in turn states: "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." BTW, the title 'Dullar' is in itself ambiguous. And the clan should've only been mentioned under it if it was a primary topic. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and revert to the original village version as previously mentioned; the clan is not notable at all Spiderone 14:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and revert to this version of the article (same as listed above by NitinMlk), which is about the village and meets WP:GEOLAND as per being verified by the Census of India (example link). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as village article. Earlier I just suggested the valid ATD. But now I have actually searched about the clan. It is not only non-notable but also wrongly placed as the primary topic. So, Dullar should be kept as a village article. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.