Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan's paradox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan's paradox

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google Scholar gets 4 hits, two written by D.P. Sheehan and the other two completely unrelated to this subject. In other news: the author of this article is a WP:SPA promoting the work of D.P. Sheehan. Guy (Help!) 23:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 23:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No demonstration of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Comment amazingly this article has generated some Quora questions. Also, I couldn't find something related to "Duncan paradox" in Google Books. MaoGo (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, aside from the peak in Quora questions about it I cannot find anything else. It is not WP:NOTABLE as per JzG. --MaoGo (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be shocked - shocked! - to learnt hat at least one of those questions traces directly to D.P. Sheehan. The question, not the answer. Guy (Help!) 13:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per JzG. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that this is a notable scientific concept, even as a superficially-a-"paradox"-but-not-really idea. XOR'easter (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Zero evidence of notability. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:11, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not even wrong. Bearian (talk) 01:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC)r[reply]
Delete Absolutely non-notable . Kpgj hpjm 16:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.