Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutch Ships in a Calm Sea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Ships in a Calm Sea

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet notability criteria. Searches in English, at least, do not reveal any articles or mention of the work independent of its creator, and the sole source used in the article is its page in the website of the museum within which it is held. No longer support deletion, per reasons outlined below. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question what are the ground rules for Notablity of artworks? Are there specific rules, separate from GNG? --Theredproject (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Other than GNG, I believe that any work of art collected by a national gallery is default notable. A national gallery is the artistic version of an encyclopedia. Mccapra (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also sources discussing this work and related pieces as masterpieces of Dutch painting, so it passes GNG. Mccapra (talk) 17:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I have added the Rijksmuseum entry as a reference for this particular painting and adjusted the National Gallery reference (previously for another painting) to support the biographical info. Collection in a major national gallery is sufficient for notability. AllyD (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As per previous comments. Zoozaz1 (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above comments. I believe the artwork should be considered notable.Aven13 16:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.