Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Pritchett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But people are free to recreate it with independent sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Pritchett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG a puff piece created by his publisher Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - presumably the creator mistakenly thinks it's okay to advertise now she's declared her COI. Deb (talk) 22:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 22:54, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 22:54, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of coverage in reliable sources. This is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Deb. This is an article about a non-notable subject that is excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. Disclosure of COI does not exempt editors from complying with our basic inclusion and content policies. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep Current sources are not independent, blogs, etc, so I'm not surprised the article was nominated and discussed. That said sufficient other references exist to establish notability. Still not stellar in my search, hence the weak keep. gidonb (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Paid is promo. Agricola44 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.