Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic SSL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic SSL

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail GNG. I've not been able to find any third party sources describing this technique. Search turns up various things describing anything from serving SSL certificates for multiple domains in one web app to the SSL protocol used in OpenVPN, but nothing on this other than their own website and Facebook page. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTPROMOTION. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 01:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 08:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.