Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EAS Pollux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 10:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EAS Pollux

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor WP:PLOT element that completely fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Definition of fancruft. Deproded by User:Andrew Davidson with unhelpful technical summary. Andrew, can you tell us why you think this topic deserves its own article? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of non-universe sources establishing notability. Reywas92^Talk 06:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of starships in Babylon 5, where this ship is covered with WP:DUEWEIGHT. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Make that Delete or merge to List of starships in Babylon 5, where it's currently not listed, indicating its either really non-notable, or the LoS is missing it. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is completely unsourced, and searching for some comes up with not a single mention in any reliable secondary source. Rorshacma (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.