Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHealthMe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EHealthMe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, references to PR releases. Clear fail of WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 07:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep because of its coverage in The Washington Post. However, due diligence is required. -Hatchens (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Along with the Washington Post article (which I can't access, but assume it's reliable under WP:AGF) the Venturebeat [1] and Digital Journal [2] sources allow it to pass WP:GNG. Z1720 (talk) 02:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.