Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EON5
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
EON5
- EON5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable record label. Fails the general notability guideline and corporations notability criteria. - TheMagnificentist 17:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Can't find any reliable source to show notability, otherwise failing our basic standards. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, article created by an SPA blocked for sockpuppetry. No RS available for this non-notable record label. — Quasar G. 18:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.