Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EWERDIMA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EWERDIMA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that establish its notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - no notability even claimed for this project —Мандичка^YO 😜 23:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches found nothing even close to good and significant. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A recent new project "started by Daniel K. Nanghaka"; article contributed by the WP:SPA User:Nanghaka. Leaving aside WP:COI considerations, Highbeam and Questia searches return nothing, and Google returns user-submitted content. At best this is WP:TOOSOON but does not meet any notability criteria at present. AllyD (talk) 06:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above, either WP:TOOSOON or else it'll never pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete – Source searches are not providing coverage to qualify an article per WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable references for the article. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and clearly fails WP:V and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete .... Fails GNG with flying colours! –Davey2010^Talk 03:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.