- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:02, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- EasyBlog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could not find any news sources. Most citations are from a primary source, a few are sourced to a Joomla extension directory, one is from a blog, and one is from a coupon site. GrinningIodize (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GrinningIodize (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Basically the nominator is correct. The secondary sources are not remotely significant coverage, and no other sources exist.Cornerstone1949 (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree with nom. Also tried looking for sources, but don't see much independent coverage. Asteramellus (talk) 20:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: lacks enough SIGCOV sources with the current citations, additional searches did not help either.Lorraine Crane (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough WP:SIGCOV Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete — agree with the nom. Most citations are primary sources. EmilyR34 (talk) 07:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.