Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easygenerator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Easygenerator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMOTIONAL article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Just another non-notable mid-tier software company failing WP:CORP MNewnham (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Software, Philippines, United Arab Emirates, Netherlands, Ukraine, and Colombia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: WP:PROMOTIONAL article per nom. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable software company fails WP:NCORP and is also WP:PROMOTIONAL. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Small software company that fails NCORP, as does the parent company for which we do not have an article to redirect to anyway. The grandparent company probably meets the bar and has an article only on Dewiki. So no case for WP:ATD on Enwiki. Remains to delete. gidonb (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.