Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eating disorders and development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eating disorders and development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant content to eating disorder - as far as I can tell, the only thing that this article has which eating disorder does not, is DSM-5 copyright violations for the diagnostic criteria. The AN "diagnostic history" section has some possibly interesting statistics, although the sources are of questionable reliability (two are deadlinks, one is from CNN) and ultimately the epidemiology at Anorexia nervosa#Epidemiology and Eating disorder#Anorexia seem to be more detailed. Contrary to the article's title, there does not seem to be any substantive discussion of the development of eating disorders except for claims in the lead that it is related with childhood development (this is covered in a few sections at eating disorder). Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychiatry and Psychology. Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per WP:CFORK. ––FormalDude talk 09:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.