Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebix Smartclass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is this does not meet notability standards. Star Mississippi 21:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ebix Smartclass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage are press releases, passing mentions, or routing coverage. Does not seem to meet WP:NCORP. Could be redirected to Ebix. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebix Smartclass Educational Services. MarioGom (talk) 11:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: There is a lot of repetition about the ownership history across the Educomp Solutions, Ebix Smartclass Educational Services and this article, all of which are recently created by the same editor. Despite that weight of content, it is probably worth considering the present article as being about the SmartClass product and assessing any notability in that respect. This source (2018) indicates that SmartClass was in use in 75,000 classrooms in India. AllyD (talk) 11:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It should be redirected neither to Ebix nor to Educomp Solutions, as they both aren't the creator and current owner of the product respectively. This source tells that this product was the first of its kind in India's education history. Derivator2017 (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing said about this company besides routine business actions, with the possible exception of a minor bankruptcy controversy not reported outside business and local press (which would be but one event). No evidence of notability; lacking WP:CORPDEPTH. FalconK (talk) 23:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Ebix page. This seems to be a good candidate for deletion but the information would sit nicely there and would add some heft to the other page. Gusfriend (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. ––FormalDude talk 20:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Routine brochure article. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 00:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.