Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echolab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Echolab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Sources only are about the company being acquired by another. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Technology, United States of America, and Massachusetts. UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT. I was originally going to suggest a merge into Blackmagic Design but I have reservations about that page's notability as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.