Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecoeats
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Ecoeats
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ecoeats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable local company, fails WP:N, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Tagishsimon (talk) 09:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable food delivery company in the gig economy. Fails WP:NCORP. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable and apparently promotional DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Ref 1 is company website, Ref 2 shows no evidence of editorial oversight and isn't even mentioned in the article it redirects to, Ref 3 is affiliated. Nothing on google. Creator's page shows multiple deleted creations for what look like commercial entities, this is likely UPE. —valereee (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: An article making no claim as to why this start-up is of encyclopaedic note, supported by announcement-based coverage in local/student media, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Although the company is expanding to the West End of Glasgow, I do not see the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.