Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecopack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ecopack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.