Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eflex9ja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eflex9ja

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable news media organisation, i searched very deeply, but nothing found special. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Nigeria. Skynxnex (talk) 15:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was unable to find anything beyond social media linked to Eflex9ja. I believe it fails to meet the basic notability criteria. Pichpich (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Non notable at all. Wonder when it was founded and no qualitative source to be inclusive on an Encyclopedia Otuọcha (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Otuọcha@Pichpich@Skynxnex@Youknowwhoistheman

Please, i have added references to the page to validate my search. You can also check use the further readings for more information. The website is https://www.eflex9ja.com.ng you can visit and read more as well as search on google for other external links. Thank you all. Jayofpedia (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here, we always appreciate efforts. As it stands, the page fails WP:WEB and even our WP:GNG. you can read more on the welcome page to see the links for better editing or you click here. Thanks Otuọcha (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These references are no good. faqabout.me is self-published and we are looking for in-depth coverage in third-party sources, aruwaab9ja.com.ng is a blog (not reliable) and in any case, that link does not provide any coverage of eflex9ja, the link to Jassen Japhethnk's GitHub does not mention eflex9ja (and in any case, is self-published) and finally, the link to radiomhz.com does not provide any significant coverage but even worse, it shows a link to "Eflex9ja FM online live radio" but that link is broken. This is not even close to what we need to meet WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.