Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eisenson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Michael R. Eisenson. Sandstein 07:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eisenson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PROD'd this with the rationale "Non-notable surname. Only one article contains the name so not suitable for use as a disambig." De-PRODder added two redlinks sourced to IMDB, which doesn't really make the case - we don't put redlinks on a disambig, and IMDB is not an RS due to the user-generated content. I've now removed those redlinks, so we're back to square one: a non-notable, unreferenced surname. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• A wiki-search indicates that there are a few hits within the encyclopedia for sources including Eisenson as an author surname, but there is currently only one article on a person with that surname, and no other noteworthy uses. Redirect to Michael R. Eisenson for now. BD2412 T 20:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as {{R from surname}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.