Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eka software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eka software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent evidence of corporate notability. Says nothing about what others have written about the company. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 03:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep http://www.smscountry.com/Technology%20Fast%2050.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.2.238.191 (talk) 11:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - These sources are not sufficient. The Deloitte Fast 50 award is trivial and should not be included in the article without WP:SECONDARY sources; It doesn't establish notability. Grayfell (talk) 20:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.