Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElDewrito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ElDewrito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. There are some hits from reliable sources, but they are not extensive enough establish independent notability from Halo: Online, which itself also fails notability criteria. The1337gamer (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ForgeAndAnvil (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC) I recommend to actually delete this page urgently, so that i can recreate the page when the game is more notable, and has more coverage.[reply]

• Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had only cursory mentions in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. A redirect to a Halo Online article would work but there is none on the subject—just a redirect to the series article and a mention of this mod would be closer to undue weight there.  czar 05:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Unsourced, seems unlikely that a game engine from a video game that doesn't even have its own dedicated article at the moment is going to have independent notability. Sergecross73 msg me 12:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable mod from non-notable video game. Clearly non-notable. Smartyllama (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.