Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Querforadat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

El Querforadat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable per:Wikipedia:Notability. One of the sources it uses is a map service. The other is a data base. Both do not show anything notable about it other then it exists, which is not enough for an entire article about by it self. I suggest that we delete it or merge with Cava, Spain. She riff U3 17:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. She riff U3 17:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GEOLAND and can be easily expanded as the Spanish language article is more detailed. SportingFlyer T·C 00:41, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given the amount of prose in the Spanish article and the ability for expansion here, I think a merge is inappropriate. SportingFlyer T·C 07:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:GEOLAND.--Asqueladd (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Cava, Spain perhaps it can be expanded, but currently the only sourced content could easily be covered in Cava, Spain without any detriment to the reader. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~ to Cava, Spain in the interests of densification. Probably meets WP:GEOLAND but this is the better content decision.--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SportingFlyer's good point about expanding using the Spanish language article. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 14:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.