Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element Fresh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 21:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Element Fresh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE check doesn't yield sufficient in-depth independent sources to pass WP:NORG. The interview cited in the article would not be considered an independent source. The remaining sources don't appear to be sufficient. Seraphim System ^(talk) 16:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 00:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 00:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 00:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Undeniable UPE spam.Bunch of unreliable non-independent sources and PR stuff.Fails NORG comprehensively and by a mile or so.....∯WBG^converse 05:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable UPE spam. Creator has refused to reply to questions about his undenaible paid editing so it is fair to assume that all his edits are suspect over and above this article that fails notability criteria. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as in-depth coverage is lacking. The chain also lacks a claim to encyclopedic significance.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete refs are generally interviews. Dial911 (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.