Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Yates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Yates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable rapper. He lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Provided references are press releases, blog posts, and other evidence of existence but not notability. Nothing better found for improvement. --Finngall ^talk 16:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 16:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 16:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete - Found a highly notable reference for the artist by AllMusic which is the most creditable reference you can get I added the link to the page as well for this of you who don't know most data on All Music is provided by Rovi which is a company that only picks up notable data if the artist was included in the database the artist is more then notable since Rovi the industry leader in music when it comes to artist notability

Side note: I thought Discog was Notable as well I guess?

Link: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/elijah-yates-mn0003423368 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3C4:4300:5F8F:F8AA:B41B:31AB:A735 (talk) 00:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link: http://www.rovicorp.com

Delete for now at best as this is still questionable for solid independent notability, currently not convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.