Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellicott Dredges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (tc) 16:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ellicott Dredges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but I don't think it has the significance or coverage to meet N. Boleyn (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 11:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Hi @Boleyn: I was starting on the cat:nn list after a few weeks away and came across this. Are they any good

I think its likely notable, give its age at 139 years. They're is likely mountains of coverage. scope_creepTalk 08:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellicott Dredges, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.