Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emediate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emediate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, SPA-created article on an entirely unremarkable advertising company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. MER-C 17:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no independent coverage. Yeti Hunter (talk) 01:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - there's no evidence of notability, and the article only barely makes a claim of notability. Nick-D (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Cannot find anything that supports notability. (Note: no Danish wiki article either.) Aoziwe (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not meet notability criteria. No secondary sources on the subject found. Spyder212 (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable. No references in a ProQuest search were found. Also worth noting that page was created by the account "Andersschaffner" which strongly appears to be WP:SPA whose purpose was to create this page. Cabrils (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I could not see much about the company other than routine commercial and business announcements. Aoziwe (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.