Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Sutton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Sutton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What our simplest standards for this in fact say themselves is there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone so what's here is simply not convincing as it it's still too minimal and suggests it's too soon. SwisterTwister talk 00:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Her credits are too few to satisfy WP:NACTOR and she hasn't received any press, so WP:GNG applies too. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – article would need significantly more sourcing to demonstrate that the subject passes WP:NACTOR. In the absence of that, notability is not demonstrated. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.