Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Michael (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete for recreation of deleted material. Article has also been salted. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Michael

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a person who does not pass GNG or any other notability criteria. Tagishsimon (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete and salt This is the fourth AfD for this biography. The article was speedy deleted as NN whilst AFD1 was going on - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Michael. The item was recreated under a new name. It was speedy deleted under that name whilst a second nomination was ongoing - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Nnamdi Michael. The item was recreated again - all against rules, of course. A couple of speedy tags added to the new article were removed by the author, again against rules (diff), (diff). A third AfD - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Michael (2nd nomination) - was started by then closed by the nominator - mistakenly, since the majority of !votes were delete and salt ... afaik one can only withdraw before delete votes are appended (see WP:WDAFD). Whatever. Time to sort this matter out once and for all. I herewith ping everyone who has been involved in the series of AfDs to date, and ask that we let this AfD run to a decision, rather than speedying or withdrawing. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Hugsyrup:, @SimonWright.au:, @RHaworth:, @Nnadigoodluck:, @Wakowako:, @Beasteggs:, @Praxidicae:, @AntiCompositeNumber:, @Ceethekreator:, @DGG:, @CAPTAIN RAJU:, @Mustapha dare:, @Ohnoitsjamie: --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt Wikipedia is not an extension of LinkedIn. Time to refund your client and move on. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:59, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.