Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thomson Reuters. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emochila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and advertising in nature. References are very poor. No credibility in references. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 13:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Thomson Reuters - they look like they could be notable, but the sourcing is very bad - David Gerard (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Thomson Reuters; exceedingly promotional article, so I would recommend a delete first. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.