Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire Software (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Empire Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero reliable sources to be found; first AfD was somehow closed as "keep" despite complete lack of arguments for that position, and equal support for "delete"—closing admin wasn't on the ball that day. —swpb^T 17:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 17:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 17:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Previous "keep" vote was 10 years ago when WP was less discriminant. No indication online that the company exists or ever existed beyond a startup, and I don't think deeper searching will turn anything up. Jergling (talk) 18:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Ah, yes, one of those 2005-6 VfDs where people routinely voted keep without any particular reason beyond they felt like it, and decisions were made on pure headcount. Of course, no one noticed that the article was created by the "owner" of this "company," and tried writing himself into Wikipedia.[1]. Obvious WP:CORP failure is obvious. Ravenswing 04:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete When the top sources found are for another former company of the same name - this is hugely non-notable. for (;;) (talk) 08:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable company. Fails ORG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.