Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergyTeachers.org (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EnergyTeachers.org

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization might fail WP:NONPROFIT. Computer165 (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unquestionably fails NONPROFIT, and no evidence of any significant press coverage. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of WP:SIGCOV. It looks interesting, but I don't see how it passes WP:GNG, since admittedly half of its members come from two adjoining states. Please ping me if you find anything else. Bearian (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no discernable independent coverage in reliable sources. Fails GNG. Also, this Wikipedia article appears to have been posted for promotional purposes. It seems like advertising for the organization. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or advertising per WP:PROMO ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional article with no no reliable sources. Many of the sources are primary or passing mentions. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 18:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.