Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engine Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Engine Digital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional website content article. References are very poor. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 07:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete the single RS is good, but not enough to swing an article on - David Gerard (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- strictly a corporate blurb; no indications of notability or significance. WP:PROMO applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.