Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ennio Emmanuel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 06:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ennio Emmanuel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Emmanuel fails notability guidelines for musicians. A quick Google search reveals little in the way of independent, reliable coverage. Much of the content about his life and music career is unsourced, failing the biographies of living persons policy. DrStrauss talk 12:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is no significant coverage in reliable independent sources, nor any peer reviews, media coverage or reasons to presume notability. Claims are vague and outsourced, mentioning upcoming albums and unpublished books and things that haven't even happened yet. When they do happen and receive widespread review, perhaps the entry on Wikipedia can be re-assessed. Until then, delete. Darthamender (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.