Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Risk Management Academy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk 03:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Enterprise Risk Management Academy
- Enterprise Risk Management Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are SPS, passing mentions, or an obvious paid/placed piece like this. Fails GNG and is basically an advertisement for the academy. This appears to be third time this article was created since mid-August, based on notices on the creator's talk page here. WP is not a directory Delete and salt. Jytdog (talk) 02:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly an avertorial. Salt too as it's unlikely to become notable in the future. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is far from satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH. I would suggest salting the title as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.